A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France - l'unam - université nantes angers le mans
Article Dans Une Revue Peer Community Journal Année : 2024

A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France

Denis Tagu
Francoise Boudet-Bône
Camille Brard
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1199526
Edith Legouy
  • Fonction : Auteur
  • PersonId : 1410257
Frédéric Gaymard

Résumé

Psychosociology theories indicate that individual evaluation is integral to the recognition of professional activities. Building upon Christophe Dejours' contributions, this recognition is influenced by two complementary judgments: the "utility" judgment from those in hierarchy and the "beauty" judgment from the peers. The aim of this paper is to elucidate how at INRAE individual assessment of scientists is conducted. This process follows a qualitative and multicriteria-based approach by peers, providing both appreciations and advice to the evaluated scientists (the "beauty" judgment). Furthermore, we expound on how INRAE regularly adapts this process to the evolving landscape of research practices, such as interdisciplinary collaboration or open science, assuring that assessments align with the current approaches of research activities.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
10_24072_pcjournal_432.pdf (1.68 Mo) Télécharger le fichier
Origine Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte
licence

Dates et versions

hal-04737567 , version 1 (08-12-2022)
hal-04737567 , version 2 (15-10-2024)

Licence

Identifiants

Citer

Denis Tagu, Francoise Boudet-Bône, Camille Brard, Edith Legouy, Frédéric Gaymard. A qualitative and multicriteria assessment of scientists: a perspective based on a case study of INRAE, France. Peer Community Journal, 2024, 4, pp.e77. ⟨10.24072/pcjournal.432⟩. ⟨hal-04737567v2⟩
374 Consultations
118 Téléchargements

Altmetric

Partager

More